Find in Library
Search millions of books, articles, and more
Indexed Open Access Databases
Forecasting global atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>
oleh: A. Agustí-Panareda, S. Massart, F. Chevallier, S. Boussetta, G. Balsamo, A. Beljaars, P. Ciais, N. M. Deutscher, R. Engelen, L. Jones, R. Kivi, J.-D. Paris, V.-H. Peuch, V. Sherlock, A. T. Vermeulen, P. O. Wennberg, D. Wunch
Format: | Article |
---|---|
Diterbitkan: | Copernicus Publications 2014-11-01 |
Deskripsi
A new global atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) real-time forecast is now available as part of the pre-operational Monitoring of Atmospheric Composition and Climate – Interim Implementation (MACC-II) service using the infrastructure of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Integrated Forecasting System (IFS). One of the strengths of the CO<sub>2</sub> forecasting system is that the land surface, including vegetation CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes, is modelled online within the IFS. Other CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes are prescribed from inventories and from off-line statistical and physical models. The CO<sub>2</sub> forecast also benefits from the transport modelling from a state-of-the-art numerical weather prediction (NWP) system initialized daily with a wealth of meteorological observations. This paper describes the capability of the forecast in modelling the variability of CO<sub>2</sub> on different temporal and spatial scales compared to observations. The modulation of the amplitude of the CO<sub>2</sub> diurnal cycle by near-surface winds and boundary layer height is generally well represented in the forecast. The CO<sub>2</sub> forecast also has high skill in simulating day-to-day synoptic variability. In the atmospheric boundary layer, this skill is significantly enhanced by modelling the day-to-day variability of the CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes from vegetation compared to using equivalent monthly mean fluxes with a diurnal cycle. However, biases in the modelled CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes also lead to accumulating errors in the CO<sub>2</sub> forecast. These biases vary with season with an underestimation of the amplitude of the seasonal cycle both for the CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes compared to total optimized fluxes and the atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> compared to observations. The largest biases in the atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> forecast are found in spring, corresponding to the onset of the growing season in the Northern Hemisphere. In the future, the forecast will be re-initialized regularly with atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> analyses based on the assimilation of CO<sub>2</sub> products retrieved from satellite measurements and CO<sub>2</sub> in situ observations, as they become available in near-real time. In this way, the accumulation of errors in the atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> forecast will be reduced. Improvements in the CO<sub>2</sub> forecast are also expected with the continuous developments in the operational IFS.