Find in Library
Search millions of books, articles, and more
Indexed Open Access Databases
Estimating Glomerular Filtration Rate from Serum Myo-Inositol, Valine, Creatinine and Cystatin C
oleh: Frank Stämmler, Marcello Grassi, Jeffrey W. Meeusen, John C. Lieske, Surendra Dasari, Laurence Dubourg, Sandrine Lemoine, Jochen Ehrich, Eric Schiffer
| Format: | Article |
|---|---|
| Diterbitkan: | MDPI AG 2021-12-01 |
Deskripsi
Assessment of renal function relies on the estimation of the glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Existing eGFR equations, usually based on serum levels of creatinine and/or cystatin C, are not uniformly accurate across patient populations. In the present study, we expanded a recent proof-of-concept approach to optimize an eGFR equation targeting the adult population with and without chronic kidney disease (CKD), based on a nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) derived ‘metabolite constellation’ (GFR<sub>NMR</sub>). A total of 1855 serum samples were partitioned into development, internal validation and external validation datasets. The new GFR<sub>NMR</sub> equation used serum myo-inositol, valine, creatinine and cystatin C plus age and sex. GFR<sub>NMR</sub> had a lower bias to tracer measured GFR (mGFR) than existing eGFR equations, with a median bias (95% confidence interval [CI]) of 0.0 (−1.0; 1.0) mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> for GFR<sub>NMR</sub> vs. −6.0 (−7.0; −5.0) mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> for the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation that combines creatinine and cystatin C (CKD-EPI<sub>2012</sub>) (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). Accuracy (95% CI) within 15% of mGFR (1-P15) was 38.8% (34.3; 42.5) for GFR<sub>NMR</sub> vs. 47.3% (43.2; 51.5) for CKD-EPI<sub>2012</sub> (<i>p</i> < 0.010). Thus, GFR<sub>NMR</sub> holds promise as an alternative way to assess eGFR with superior accuracy in adult patients with and without CKD.