Find in Library
Search millions of books, articles, and more
Indexed Open Access Databases
Tropospheric aerosol microphysics simulation with assimilated meteorology: model description and intermodel comparison
oleh: W. Trivitayanurak, P. J. Adams, D. V. Spracklen, K. S. Carslaw
Format: | Article |
---|---|
Diterbitkan: | Copernicus Publications 2008-06-01 |
Deskripsi
We implement the TwO-Moment Aerosol Sectional (TOMAS) microphysics module into GEOS-CHEM, a CTM driven by assimilated meteorology. TOMAS has 30 size sections covering 0.01–10 μm diameter with conservation equations for both aerosol mass and number. The implementation enables GEOS-CHEM to simulate aerosol microphysics, size distributions, mass and number concentrations. The model system is developed for sulfate and sea-salt aerosols, a year-long simulation has been performed, and results are compared to observations. Additionally model intercomparison was carried out involving global models with sectional microphysics: GISS GCM-II' and GLOMAP. Comparison with marine boundary layer observations of CN10 and CCN(0.2%) shows that all models perform well with average errors of 30–50%. However, all models underpredict CN10 by up to 42% between 15&deg; S and 45&deg; S while overpredicting CN10 up to 52% between 45&deg; N and 60&deg; N, which could be due to the sea-salt emission parameterization and the assumed size distribution of primary sulfate emission, in each case respectively. Model intercomparison at the surface shows that GISS GCM-II' and GLOMAP, each compared against GEOS-CHEM, both predict 40% higher CN10 and predict 20% and 30% higher CCN(0.2%) on average, respectively. Major discrepancies are due to different emission inventories and transport. Budget comparison shows GEOS-CHEM predicts the lowest global CCN(0.2%) due to microphysical growth being a factor of 2 lower than other models because of lower SO<sub>2</sub> availability. These findings stress the need for accurate meteorological inputs, updated emission inventories, and realistic clouds and oxidant fields when evaluating global aerosol microphysics models.