Find in Library
Search millions of books, articles, and more
Indexed Open Access Databases
In Silico Approach Using Free Software to Optimize the Antiproliferative Activity and Predict the Potential Mechanism of Action of Pyrrolizine-Based Schiff Bases
oleh: Faisal A. Almalki, Ashraf N. Abdalla, Ahmed M. Shawky, Mahmoud A. El Hassab, Ahmed M. Gouda
Format: | Article |
---|---|
Diterbitkan: | MDPI AG 2021-06-01 |
Deskripsi
In the current study, a simple in silico approach using free software was used with the experimental studies to optimize the antiproliferative activity and predict the potential mechanism of action of pyrrolizine-based Schiff bases. A compound library of 288 Schiff bases was designed based on compound <b>10,</b> and a pharmacophore search was performed. Structural analysis of the top scoring hits and a docking study were used to select the best derivatives for the synthesis. Chemical synthesis and structural elucidation of compounds <b>16a–h</b> were discussed. The antiproliferative activity of <b>16a</b>–<b>h</b> was evaluated against three cancer (MCF7, A2780 and HT29, IC<sub>50</sub> = 0.01–40.50 μM) and one normal MRC5 (IC<sub>50</sub> = 1.27–24.06 μM) cell lines using the MTT assay. The results revealed the highest antiproliferative activity against MCF7 cells for <b>16g</b> (IC<sub>50</sub> = 0.01 μM) with an exceptionally high selectivity index of (SI = 578). Cell cycle analysis of MCF7 cells treated with compound <b>16g</b> revealed a cell cycle arrest at the G<sub>2</sub>/M phase. In addition, compound <b>16g</b> induced a dose-dependent increase in apoptotic events in MCF7 cells compared to the control. In silico target prediction of compound <b>16g</b> showed six potential targets that could mediate these activities. Molecular docking analysis of compound <b>16g</b> revealed high binding affinities toward COX-2, MAP P38α, EGFR, and CDK2. The results of the MD simulation revealed low RMSD values and high negative binding free energies for the two complexes formed between compound <b>16g</b> with EGFR, and CDK2, while COX-2 was in the third order. These results highlighted a great potentiality for <b>16g</b> to inhibit both CDK2 and EGFR. Taken together, the results mentioned above highlighted compound <b>16g</b> as a potential anticancer agent.