IASI-derived NH<sub>3</sub> enhancement ratios relative to CO for the tropical biomass burning regions

oleh: S. Whitburn, M. Van Damme, L. Clarisse, D. Hurtmans, C. Clerbaux, C. Clerbaux, P.-F. Coheur

Format: Article
Diterbitkan: Copernicus Publications 2017-10-01

Deskripsi

Vegetation fires are a major source of ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>) in the atmosphere. Their emissions are mainly estimated using bottom-up approaches that rely on uncertain emission factors. In this study, we derive new biome-specific NH<sub>3</sub> enhancement ratios relative to carbon monoxide (CO), ER<sub>NH<sub>3</sub> ∕ CO</sub> (directly related to the emission factors), from the measurements of the IASI sounder onboard the Metop-A satellite. This is achieved for large tropical regions and for an 8-year period (2008&ndash;2015). We find substantial differences in the ER<sub>NH<sub>3</sub> ∕ CO</sub> ratios between the biomes studied, with calculated values ranging from 7  ×  10<sup>−3</sup> to 23  ×  10<sup>−3</sup>. For evergreen broadleaf forest these are typically 50&ndash;75 % higher than for woody savanna and savanna biomes. This variability is attributed to differences in fuel types and size and is in line with previous studies. The analysis of the spatial and temporal distribution of the ER<sub>NH<sub>3</sub> ∕ CO</sub> ratio also reveals a (sometimes large) within-biome variability. On a regional level, woody savanna shows, for example, a mean ER<sub>NH<sub>3</sub> ∕ CO</sub> ratio for the region of Africa south of the Equator that is 40&ndash;75 % lower than in the other five regions studied, probably reflecting regional differences in fuel type and burning conditions. The same variability is also observed on a yearly basis, with a peak in the ER<sub>NH<sub>3</sub> ∕ CO</sub> ratio observed for the year 2010 for all biomes. These results highlight the need for the development of dynamic emission factors that take into better account local variations in fuel type and fire conditions. We also compare the IASI-derived ER<sub>NH<sub>3</sub> ∕ CO</sub> ratio with values reported in the literature, usually calculated from ground-based or airborne measurements. We find general good agreement in the referenced ER<sub>NH<sub>3</sub> ∕ CO</sub> ratio except for cropland, for which the ER<sub>NH<sub>3</sub> ∕ CO</sub> ratio shows an underestimation of about 2&ndash;2.5 times.