Carbon–nitrogen interactions in European forests and semi-natural vegetation – Part 2: Untangling climatic, edaphic, management and nitrogen deposition effects on carbon sequestration potentials

oleh: C. R. Flechard, M. van Oijen, D. R. Cameron, W. de Vries, A. Ibrom, N. Buchmann, N. B. Dise, I. A. Janssens, J. Neirynck, L. Montagnani, L. Montagnani, A. Varlagin, D. Loustau, A. Legout, K. Ziemblińska, M. Aubinet, M. Aurela, B. H. Chojnicki, J. Drewer, W. Eugster, A.-J. Francez, R. Juszczak, B. Kitzler, W. L. Kutsch, A. Lohila, A. Lohila, B. Longdoz, G. Matteucci, V. Moreaux, V. Moreaux, A. Neftel, J. Olejnik, J. Olejnik, M. J. Sanz, J. Siemens, T. Vesala, T. Vesala, C. Vincke, E. Nemitz, S. Zechmeister-Boltenstern, K. Butterbach-Bahl, U. M. Skiba, M. A. Sutton

Format: Article
Diterbitkan: Copernicus Publications 2020-03-01

Deskripsi

<p>The effects of atmospheric nitrogen deposition (<span class="inline-formula"><i>N</i><sub>dep</sub></span>) on carbon (C) sequestration in forests have often been assessed by relating differences in productivity to spatial variations of <span class="inline-formula"><i>N</i><sub>dep</sub></span> across a large geographic domain. These correlations generally suffer from covariation of other confounding variables related to climate and other growth-limiting factors, as well as large uncertainties in total (dry&thinsp;<span class="inline-formula">+</span>&thinsp;wet) reactive nitrogen (<span class="inline-formula"><i>N</i><sub>r</sub></span>) deposition. We propose a methodology for untangling the effects of <span class="inline-formula"><i>N</i><sub>dep</sub></span> from those of meteorological variables, soil water retention capacity and stand age, using a mechanistic forest growth model in combination with eddy covariance <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> exchange fluxes from a Europe-wide network of 22 forest flux towers. Total <span class="inline-formula"><i>N</i><sub>r</sub></span> deposition rates were estimated from local measurements as far as possible. The forest data were compared with data from natural or semi-natural, non-woody vegetation sites.</p> <p>The response of forest net ecosystem productivity to nitrogen deposition (<span class="inline-formula">dNEP ∕ d<i>N</i><sub>dep</sub></span>) was estimated after accounting for the effects on gross primary productivity (GPP) of the co-correlates by means of a meta-modelling standardization procedure, which resulted in a reduction by a factor of about 2 of the uncorrected, apparent <span class="inline-formula">dGPP ∕ d<i>N</i><sub>dep</sub></span> value. This model-enhanced analysis of the C and <span class="inline-formula"><i>N</i><sub>dep</sub></span> flux observations at the scale of the European network suggests a mean overall <span class="inline-formula">dNEP ∕ d<i>N</i><sub>dep</sub></span> response of forest lifetime C sequestration to <span class="inline-formula"><i>N</i><sub>dep</sub></span> of the order of 40–50&thinsp;g&thinsp;C per g&thinsp;N, which is slightly larger but not significantly different from the range of estimates published in the most recent reviews. Importantly, patterns of gross primary and net ecosystem productivity versus <span class="inline-formula"><i>N</i><sub>dep</sub></span> were non-linear, with no further growth responses at high <span class="inline-formula"><i>N</i><sub>dep</sub></span> levels (<span class="inline-formula"><i>N</i><sub>dep</sub></span>&thinsp;<span class="inline-formula">&gt;</span>&thinsp;2.5–3&thinsp;g&thinsp;N&thinsp;m<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−2</sup></span>&thinsp;yr<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−1</sup></span>) but accompanied by increasingly large ecosystem N losses by leaching and gaseous emissions. The reduced increase in productivity per unit N deposited at high <span class="inline-formula"><i>N</i><sub>dep</sub></span> levels implies that the forecast increased <span class="inline-formula"><i>N</i><sub>r</sub></span> emissions and increased <span class="inline-formula"><i>N</i><sub>dep</sub></span> levels in large areas of Asia may not positively impact the continent's forest <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> sink. The large level of unexplained variability in observed carbon sequestration efficiency (CSE) across sites further adds to the uncertainty in the <span class="inline-formula">dC∕dN</span> response.</p>