Find in Library
Search millions of books, articles, and more
Indexed Open Access Databases
Optimizing airway wall segmentation and quantification by reducing the influence of adjacent vessels and intravascular contrast material with a modified integral-based algorithm in quantitative computed tomography.
oleh: Philip Konietzke, Oliver Weinheimer, Willi L Wagner, Felix Wuennemann, Christian Hintze, Juergen Biederer, Claus P Heussel, Hans-Ulrich Kauczor, Mark O Wielpütz
Format: | Article |
---|---|
Diterbitkan: | Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01 |
Deskripsi
<h4>Introduction</h4>Quantitative analysis of multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) plays an increasingly important role in assessing airway disease. Depending on the algorithms used, airway dimensions may be over- or underestimated, primarily if contrast material was used. Therefore, we tested a modified integral-based method (IBM) to address this problem.<h4>Methods</h4>Temporally resolved cine-MDCT was performed in seven ventilated pigs in breath-hold during iodinated contrast material (CM) infusion over 60s. Identical slices in non-enhanced (NE), pulmonary-arterial (PA), systemic-arterial (SA), and venous phase (VE) were subjected to an in-house software using a standard and a modified IBM. Total diameter (TD), lumen area (LA), wall area (WA), and wall thickness (WT) were measured for ten extra- and six intrapulmonary airways.<h4>Results</h4>The modified IBM significantly reduced TD by 7.6%, LA by 12.7%, WA by 9.7%, and WT by 3.9% compared to standard IBM on non-enhanced CT (p<0.05). Using standard IBM, CM led to a decrease of all airway parameters compared to NE. For example, LA decreased from 80.85±49.26mm2 at NE, to 75.14±47.96mm2 (-7.1%) at PA (p<0.001), 74.96±48.55mm2 (-7.3%) at SA (p<0.001), and to 78.95±48.94mm2 (-2.4%) at VE (p = 0.200). Using modified IBM, the differences were reduced to -3.1% at PA, -2.9% at SA and -0.7% at VE (p<0.001; p<0.001; p = 1.000).<h4>Conclusions</h4>The modified IBM can optimize airway wall segmentation and reduce the influence of CM on quantitative CT. This allows a more precise measurement as well as potentially the comparison of enhanced with non-enhanced scans in inflammatory airway disease.