Find in Library
Search millions of books, articles, and more
Indexed Open Access Databases
Eight Weeks of Supervised Pulmonary Rehabilitation Are Effective in Improving Resting Heart Rate and Heart Rate Recovery in Severe COVID-19 Patient Survivors of Mechanical Ventilation
oleh: María Fernanda del Valle, Jorge Valenzuela, Gabriel Nasri Marzuca-Nassr, Consuelo Cabrera-Inostroza, Mariano del Sol, Pablo A. Lizana, Máximo Escobar-Cabello, Rodrigo Muñoz-Cofre
| Format: | Article |
|---|---|
| Diterbitkan: | MDPI AG 2022-04-01 |
Deskripsi
<i>Background and Objectives</i>: Patients who survive severe COVID-19 require significant pulmonary rehabilitation. Heart rate (HR) has been used as a safety variable in the evaluation of the results of interventions in patients undergoing pulmonary rehabilitation. The aim of this research was to analyse HR during a pulmonary rehabilitation program in post-severe COVID-19 patients who survived mechanical ventilation (MV). The study includes the initial and final evaluations and aerobic training sessions. <i>Materials and Methods:</i> Twenty patients (58 ± 13 years, 11 men) were trained for 8 weeks. A 6-minute walk test (6 MWT) was performed and, subsequently, a supervised and individualised training plan was created. Resting heart rate (RHR), heart rate recovery (HRR), heart rate at minute 6 (HR6 min) and the product of HR6 min and systolic blood pressure (HR6 min<sup>x</sup>SBP) were measured at 6 MWT. In addition, HR was measured at each training session. <i>Results:</i> After 8 weeks of pulmonary rehabilitation, patients decreased their RHR from 81.95 ± 9.36 to 73.60 ± 9.82 beats/min (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and significantly increased their HRR from 12.45 ± 10.22 to 20.55 ± 7.33 beats/min (<i>p</i> = 0.005). HR6 min presented a significant relationship with walking speed and walked distance after the pulmonary rehabilitation period (r = 0.555, <i>p</i> = 0.011 and r = 0.613, <i>p</i> = 0.011, respectively). HR6 min<sup>x</sup>SBP presented a significant relationship with walking speed and walked distance after training (r = 0.538, <i>p</i> = 0.014 and r = 0.568, <i>p</i> = 0.008, respectively). In the pulmonary rehabilitation sessions, a significant decrease in HR was observed at minutes 1, 6 and 15 (<i>p</i> < 0.05) between sessions 1 and 6 and at minute 1 between sessions 1 and 12. <i>Conclusions:</i> Eight weeks of individualised and supervised pulmonary rehabilitation were effective in improving RHR and HRR in COVID-19 patients surviving MV. HR is an easily accessible indicator that could help to monitor the evaluation and development of a pulmonary rehabilitation program in COVID-19 patients who survived MV.