Find in Library
Search millions of books, articles, and more
Indexed Open Access Databases
Patients' Attitudes to Unproven Therapies in Treating COVID-19 Merit Evaluation
oleh: Hong-tian Li, Zhi-hao Cheng, Yong-ying Huang, Xi-lin Lv, Yu-bo Zhou, Erdan Dong, Jian-meng Liu
Format: | Article |
---|---|
Diterbitkan: | Elsevier 2020-08-01 |
Deskripsi
Since the outbreak of COVID-19, many randomized controlled trials have been launched to test the efficacy of promising treatments. These trials will offer great promise for future treatment. However, a public health emergency calls for a balance between gathering sound evidence and granting therapeutic access to promising trial drugs as widely as possible. In an electronic survey, we found that 3.9% of the participants preferred to receive an unproven trial drug directly in the hypothetical scenario of mild COVID-19 infection. This percentage increased drastically to 31.1% and 54.2% in the hypothetical scenario of severe and extremely severe infection, respectively. Our survey indicates a likelihood of substantial receptivity of trial drugs among actual patients in severe conditions. From the perspective of deontological ethics, a trial can only be approved when potential benefits of the investigational treatment are presumed to outweigh risks, so compassionate or off-label use of investigational therapies merits evaluation.