Find in Library
Search millions of books, articles, and more
Indexed Open Access Databases
COMPARISON OF OUTCOMES AFTER MATCHED RELATED, UNRELATED AND HAPLOIDENTICAL DONOR BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION FOR PATIENTS WITH ACQUIRED APLASTIC ANEMIA: A MULTICENTER RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF REAL-WORLD EXPERIENCE IN BRAZIL
oleh: R Marchesini, I Colturato, RR Muratori, VAM Funke, SK Nabhan, G Loth, FR Barbieri, ERP Delattre, ACM Lima, C Bonfim
| Format: | Article |
|---|---|
| Diterbitkan: | Elsevier 2023-10-01 |
Deskripsi
Introduction/objectives: Severe Aplastic Anemia (SAA) is the most frequent indication for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT) for nonmalignant diseases in Brazil. Survival after HCT from HLA-Matched Related (MRD), HLA-Matched Unrelated (MUD), and Haploidentical Donors (HID) has improved over the past decades. We aimed to compare the outcomes of a large cohort of patients (pts) submitted to HCT for acquired SAA in Brazil. Methods: A retrospective, non-randomized study included 328 pts with acquired SAA who underwent HCT in 5 Brazilian HCT centers between 01/2012 and 12/2022. All pts received bone marrow as the graft source from MRD (n = 154), MUD (n = 96), or HID (n = 78). MUD was defined as HLA 10/10 or 8/8. Results: Pts and donors’ characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Median follow-up after HCT was 4.7 years. Median age was 18.4 years (1‒69 years), most were CMV positive and heavily transfused. 74% had received previous immunosuppression with (n = 09) or without Rabbit-ATG (n = 134). Median disease duration before transplant was 7 months (0.6‒184), however pts with a MRD were transplanted earlier. There were some statistical differences among groups: HID were performed more recently and ATG was more frequently used in MUD. Conditioning regimen and GVHD prophylaxis were also different among donor groups. One-year cumulative incidence of Graft Failure (GF) in MRD, MUD, and HID cohort was 4.8%, 10.8% and 18.1% (p = 0.0028), respectively. 27 pts were rescued with a 2nd transplant (MRD, n = 7;MUD, n = 8;HID, n = 12) at a median of 40 days after 1st HCT, and 14 are alive. In a Multivariate Analysis (MVA), MUD-HCT (HR = 2.35, p = 0.078) and HID-HCT (HR = 4.30, p = 0.0012) were associated with a higher incidence of GF (Table 2). MRD-HCT had a lower incidence of grade II–IV acute graft versus host disease (aGvHD) compared with MUD and HID (12.4% vs. 30.3% vs. 16.9%, p = 0.00175) and lower incidence of chronic GvHD (cGvHD) (8,7% vs. 26,9% vs. 27.2%, p ≤ 0.001).The estimated non adjusted 5-year Overall Survival (OS) for the MRD, MUD, and HID groups were 86%, 72% and 79% (p = 0.02), respectively; event-free survival (event: rejection or death) rates were 85%, 68% and 56%, respectively (p < 0.001) (Figs. 1 and 2). In MVA, OS was increased for transplantations after 2018 (HR = 0.38, p = 0.002) (Fig. 3). MUD-HCT (HR = 3.13, p≤0.001) and HID-HCT (HR = 2.97, p = 0.0039) were associated with decreased OS in comparison to MRD-HCT. The 100-day CI of CMV reactivation and hemorrhagic cystitis were 56% and 8% respectively, with no significant differences between groups. 64 pts died at a median of 102 days (range 2–2328), and the main causes of death were GF, n = 20; sepsis, n = 11; GvHD, n = 9. Discussion: This retrospective analysis showcases some significant differences between donor groups, including the fact that MRD pts are transplanted earlier and are subjected to a lower risk of GF, acute and chronic GVHD, which translates into better survival. HID-HCT showed improved survival in recent years, becoming a more viable transplant option, specially in comparison to MUD-HCT. Improved OS in HID-HCT comes at the expense of higher rates of graft rejection and higher rates of aGvHD remain an issue after MUD-HCT. Conclusion: These real-world data from a large cohort of SAA pts demonstrate that HCT remains an effective curative treatment with significant improvement in survival in the last 5 years across different donor groups.