Find in Library
Search millions of books, articles, and more
Indexed Open Access Databases
Evaluation of suitable reference genes for gene expression studies in porcine alveolar macrophages in response to LPS and LTA
oleh: Cinar Mehmet, Islam Mohammad, Uddin Muhammad, Tholen Ernst, Tesfaye Dawit, Looft Christian, Schellander Karl
Format: | Article |
---|---|
Diterbitkan: | BMC 2012-02-01 |
Deskripsi
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>To obtain reliable quantitative real-time PCR data, normalization relative to stable housekeeping genes (HKGs) is required. However, in practice, expression levels of 'typical' housekeeping genes have been found to vary between tissues and under different experimental conditions. To date, validation studies of reference genes in pigs are relatively rare and have never been performed in porcine alveolar macrophages (AMs). In this study, expression stability of putative housekeeping genes were identified in the porcine AMs in response to the stimulation with two pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and lipoteichoic acid (LTA). Three different algorithms (geNorm, Normfinder and BestKeeper) were applied to assess the stability of HKGs.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The mRNA expression stability of nine commonly used reference genes (<it>B2M, BLM, GAPDH, HPRT1, PPIA, RPL4, SDHA, TBP </it>and <it>YWHAZ</it>) was determined by qRT-PCR in AMs that were stimulated by LPS and LTA <it>in vitro</it>. mRNA expression levels of all genes were found to be affected by the type of stimulation and duration of the stimulation (<it>P </it>< 0.0001). geNorm software revealed that <it>SDHA, B2M </it>and <it>RPL4 </it>showed a high expression stability in the irrespective to the stimulation group, while <it>SDHA, YWHAZ </it>and <it>RPL4 </it>showed high stability in non-stimulated control group. In all cases, <it>GAPDH </it>showed the least stability in geNorm. NormFinder revealed that <it>SDHA </it>was the most stable gene in all the groups. Moreover, geNorm software suggested that the geometric mean of the three most stable genes would be the suitable combination for accurate normalization of gene expression study.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>There was discrepancy in the ranking order of reference genes obtained by different analysing algorithms. In conclusion, the geometric mean of the <it>SDHA, YWHAZ </it>and <it>RPL4 </it>seemed to be the most appropriate combination of HKGs for accurate normalization of gene expression data in porcine AMs without knowing the type of bacterial pathogenic status of the animals.</p>