Conventional Hospitalization versus Sequential Outpatient Parenteral Antibiotic Therapy for <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> Bacteremia: Post-Hoc Analysis of a Multicenter Observational Cohort

oleh: Nerea Castillo-Fernández, Pedro María Martínez Pérez-Crespo, Elena Salamanca-Rivera, Laura Herrera-Hidalgo, Arístides de Alarcón, María Dolores Navarro-Amuedo, Teresa Marrodán Ciordia, María Teresa Pérez-Rodríguez, Juan Sevilla-Blanco, Alfredo Jover-Saenz, Jonathan Fernández-Suárez, Carlos Armiñanzas-Castillo, José María Reguera-Iglesias, Clara Natera Kindelán, Lucía Boix-Palop, Eva León Jiménez, Fátima Galán-Sánchez, Alfonso del Arco Jiménez, Alberto Bahamonde-Carrasco, David Vinuesa García, Alejandro Smithson Amat, Jordi Cuquet Pedragosa, Isabel María Reche Molina, Inés Pérez Camacho, Esperanza Merino de Lucas, Belén Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez, Jesús Rodríguez Baño, Luis Eduardo López Cortés

Format: Article
Diterbitkan: MDPI AG 2023-01-01

Deskripsi

It is not known whether sequential outpatient parenteral antimicrobial (OPAT) is as safe and effective as conventional hospitalization in patients with <i>S. aureus</i> bacteremia (SAB). A post-hoc analysis of the comparative effectiveness of conventional hospitalization versus sequential OPAT was performed in two prospective Spanish cohorts of patients with S. <i>aureus bacteremia</i>. The PROBAC cohort is a national, multicenter, prospective observational cohort of patients diagnosed in 22 Spanish hospitals between October 2016 and March 2017. The DOMUS OPAT cohort is a prospective observational cohort including patients from two university hospitals in Seville, Spain from 2012 to 2021. Multivariate regression was performed, including a propensity score (PS) for receiving OPAT, stratified analysis according to PS quartiles, and matched pair analyses based on PS. Four hundred and thirteen patients were included in the analysis: 150 in sequential OPAT and 263 in the full hospitalization therapy group. In multivariate analysis, including PS and center effect as covariates, 60-day treatment failure was lower in the OPAT group than in the full hospitalization group (<i>p</i> < 0.001; OR 0.275, 95%CI 0.129–0.584). In the PS-based matched analyses, sequential treatment under OPAT was not associated with higher 60-day treatment failure (<i>p</i> = 0.253; adjusted OR 0.660; % CI 0.324–1.345). OPAT is a safe and effective alternative to conventional in-patient therapy for completion of treatment in well-selected patients with SAB, mainly those associated with a low-risk source and without end-stage kidney disease.