Robust observational constraint of uncertain aerosol processes and emissions in a climate model and the effect on aerosol radiative forcing

oleh: J. S. Johnson, L. A. Regayre, M. Yoshioka, K. J. Pringle, S. T. Turnock, J. Browse, D. M. H. Sexton, J. W. Rostron, N. A. J. Schutgens, D. G. Partridge, D. Liu, D. Liu, J. D. Allan, J. D. Allan, H. Coe, A. Ding, D. D. Cohen, A. Atanacio, V. Vakkari, V. Vakkari, E. Asmi, K. S. Carslaw

Format: Article
Diterbitkan: Copernicus Publications 2020-08-01

Deskripsi

<p>The effect of observational constraint on the ranges of uncertain physical and chemical process parameters was explored in a global aerosol–climate model. The study uses 1 million variants of the Hadley Centre General Environment Model version 3 (HadGEM3) that sample 26 sources of uncertainty, together with over 9000 monthly aggregated grid-box measurements of aerosol optical depth, PM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>2.5</sub></span>, particle number concentrations, sulfate and organic mass concentrations. Despite many compensating effects in the model, the procedure constrains the probability distributions of parameters related to secondary organic aerosol, anthropogenic <span class="inline-formula">SO<sub>2</sub></span> emissions, residential emissions, sea spray emissions, dry deposition rates of <span class="inline-formula">SO<sub>2</sub></span> and aerosols, new particle formation, cloud droplet pH and the diameter of primary combustion particles. Observational constraint rules out nearly 98&thinsp;% of the model variants. On constraint, the <span class="inline-formula">±1<i>σ</i></span> (standard deviation) range of global annual mean direct radiative forcing (RF<span class="inline-formula"><sub>ari</sub></span>) is reduced by 33&thinsp;% to <span class="inline-formula">−0.14</span> to <span class="inline-formula">−0.26</span>&thinsp;<span class="inline-formula">W m<sup>−2</sup></span>, and the 95&thinsp;% credible interval (CI) is reduced by 34&thinsp;% to <span class="inline-formula">−0.1</span> to <span class="inline-formula">−0.32</span>&thinsp;<span class="inline-formula">W m<sup>−2</sup></span>. For the global annual mean aerosol–cloud radiative forcing, RF<span class="inline-formula"><sub>aci</sub></span>, the <span class="inline-formula">±1<i>σ</i></span> range is reduced by 7&thinsp;% to <span class="inline-formula">−1.66</span> to <span class="inline-formula">−2.48</span>&thinsp;<span class="inline-formula">W m<sup>−2</sup></span>, and the 95&thinsp;% CI by 6&thinsp;% to <span class="inline-formula">−1.28</span> to <span class="inline-formula">−2.88</span>&thinsp;<span class="inline-formula">W m<sup>−2</sup></span>. The tightness of the constraint is limited by parameter cancellation effects (model equifinality) as well as the large and poorly defined “representativeness error” associated with comparing point measurements with a global model. The constraint could also be narrowed if model structural errors that prevent simultaneous agreement with different measurement types in multiple locations and seasons could be improved. For example, constraints using either sulfate or PM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>2.5</sub></span> measurements individually result in RF<span class="inline-formula"><sub>ari</sub>±1<i>σ</i></span> ranges that only just overlap, which<span id="page9492"/> shows that emergent constraints based on one measurement type may be overconfident.</p>