Find in Library
Search millions of books, articles, and more
Indexed Open Access Databases
Assessment of MERRA-2 Surface PM<sub>2.5</sub> over the Yangtze River Basin: Ground-based Verification, Spatiotemporal Distribution and Meteorological Dependence
oleh: Lijie He, Aiwen Lin, Xinxin Chen, Hao Zhou, Zhigao Zhou, Peipei He
| Format: | Article |
|---|---|
| Diterbitkan: | MDPI AG 2019-02-01 |
Deskripsi
A good understanding of how meteorological conditions exacerbate or mitigate air pollution is critical for developing robust emission reduction policies. Thus, based on a multiple linear regression (MLR) model in this study, the quantified impacts of six meteorological variables on PM<sub>2.5</sub> (i.e., particle matter with diameter of 2.5 µm or less) and its major components were estimated over the Yangtze River Basin (YRB). The 38-year (1980⁻2017) daily PM<sub>2.5</sub> and meteorological data were derived from the newly-released Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis and Research and Application, version 2 (MERRA-2) products. The MERRA-2 PM<sub>2.5</sub> was underestimated compared with ground measurements, partly due to the bias in the MERRA-2 Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) assimilation. An over-increasing trend in each PM<sub>2.5</sub> component occurred for the whole study period; however, this has been curbed since 2007. The MLR model suggested that meteorological variability could explain up to 67% of the PM<sub>2.5</sub> changes. PM<sub>2.5</sub> was robustly anti-correlated with surface wind speed, precipitation and boundary layer height (BLH), but was positively correlated with temperature throughout the YRB. The relationship of relative humidity (RH) and total cloud cover with PM<sub>2.5</sub> showed regional dependencies, with negative correlation in the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) and positive correlation in the other areas. In particular, PM<sub>2.5</sub> was most sensitive to surface wind speed, and the sensitivity was approximately −2.42 µg m<sup>−3</sup> m<sup>−1</sup> s. This study highlighted the impact of meteorological conditions on PM<sub>2.5</sub> growth, although it was much smaller than the anthropogenic emissions impact.