Find in Library
Search millions of books, articles, and more
Indexed Open Access Databases
A Survey on Nostalgic Throwback to Popular Culture Elements in Two Poems of “Yadeten” and “Marouvezou”
oleh: Najme Dorri, Ahmad Hajebi
Format: | Article |
---|---|
Diterbitkan: | University of Isfahan 2017-04-01 |
Deskripsi
Local poem is one of cultural manifestation for every nation. The study of the Iranian various ethnic pop cultures by poetry indigenous exploring results in better understanding of the cultural elements of these sub-cultures. Since nostalgic concepts are one of the leading indicators in the local systems, we can explore historical, social and cultural factors of the formation and evolution of these indicators in addition to by studying and comparing nostalgia components in different cultures in addition to extracting the elements of similarities and differences of these components.Two native poems of Yadeten by Saleh Sangbor and Marouvezou by Faramarz Shakouri which first has been said in a Persian dialect of Bandar Abbasi and second has been said in a Gilaki dialect of Abkenari reflect the view of the public culture of two people living in Bandar Abbas and Bandar Anzali. Both poems reflect the poet's nostalgic throwback to the old days. It has been attempted in this research that the nostalgic view components of the two poets to the cultural elements of the society be studied in which they lived. For this purpose, the nostalgic notions of the two systems have been compared and analyzed under the general title of individual and collective memory. In the individual memory nostalgia section, reversion to the childhood and reconstruction of the space of that era is one of the main pillars of both poems of "Yadeten" and "Marouvezou". Saleh Sangbor considers his childhood remembrance to his human right and identity. Shakouri in the poem of "Marouvezou" has a nostalgic return to his childhood and the memories of these days made such a magical and timeless impression in the soul of the poet that he has never been able to be removed from the charismatic influence of those days in later periods of his life. The throwback views to the childhood in the two aforementioned poems can be considered in reviewing local games, social customs and beliefs, persons, places and objects nostalgic and legends and folk songs mentioned in two works.Recursion to nature is another aspect of the nostalgic throwback of the two poets to the past days. Both poems start by citing the nostalgic memories of the land nature in which the poet lived and all over the two poems contain the citation of the elements of the primitive life in the rural heart of the nature. The distinction of the naturalism of the two poets refers to the climate in which they lived. Introspective and empathic understanding of the nature and its elements in both works is quite obvious and the elements of the nature have an important share in the two works in the descriptions and imagery. Both the poet attempt to present a kind of an absolutely ideal imagination from the past primitive and rural society of the past having more connection to the area nature. The critique of modern civilization and modernism imposed on ethnic minorities is another common aspect of the two poems. In both poems, the poet deals with criticizing the new civilization appearances after passing the childhood and adolescence. In Yadeten, these criticisms cover about one-third of the total poems. Both of the poets complain about the civilization which put enmity rather than friendship and sham rather than truth after citing sincerity and the past links and they hate some consequences such as addiction, unemployment and slaughtering of innocents. Sangbor and Shakouri consider greed and getting away from human nature as the most important negative consequence of the new era.In both systems, the general spirit of the two works in addition to stating the individual nostalgic multiple memories is the recursion of the collective memory of two people of Bandari and Gilaki. In fact, his individual memory is a page of the collective memory album of the people. In the systems of Yadeten and Marouvezou, the adudience is not the forest and wetland and a particular individual, but he is a collective memory of these nations. In this citation, the historical aspect is dominant on the mythological one. The representation of the cultural elements of the public of the two people shows that the cultural elements of the two parties contain many aspects in common in spite of the diversity and difference