Validation of five years (2003–2007) of SCIAMACHY CO total column measurements using ground-based spectrometer observations

oleh: A. M. Poberovskii, E. I. Grechko, A. V. Dzhola, C. Rinsland, M. Schneider, F. Hase, T. Blumenstock, T. Hawat, M. Palm, J. Notholt, H. Fast, R. L. Mittermeier, M. De Mazière, D. W. T. Griffith, N. M. Deutscher, C. Paton-Walsh, N. B. Jones, E. Mahieu, K. Suzuki, Y. Nagahama, I. Aben, H. Schrijver, A. M. S. Gloudemans, A. T. J. de Laat, M. V. Makarova, J. Mellqvist, A. Strandberg, R. Sussmann, T. Borsdorff, M. Rettinger

Format: Article
Diterbitkan: Copernicus Publications 2010-10-01

Deskripsi

This paper presents a validation study of SCanning Imaging Absorption spectroMeter for Atmospheric CHartographY (SCIAMACHY) carbon monoxide (CO) total column measurements from the Iterative Maximum Likelihood Method (IMLM) algorithm using ground-based spectrometer observations from twenty surface stations for the five year time period of 2003–2007. <br><br> Overall we find a good agreement between SCIAMACHY and ground-based observations for both mean values as well as seasonal variations. <br><br> For high-latitude Northern Hemisphere stations absolute differences between SCIAMACHY and ground-based measurements are close to or fall within the SCIAMACHY CO 2&sigma; precision of 0.2 &times; 10<sup>18</sup> molecules/cm<sup>2</sup> (&sim;10%) indicating that SCIAMACHY can observe CO accurately at high Northern Hemisphere latitudes. <br><br> For Northern Hemisphere mid-latitude stations the validation is complicated due to the vicinity of emission sources for almost all stations, leading to higher ground-based measurements compared to SCIAMACHY CO within its typical sampling area of 8° &times; 8°. <br><br> Comparisons with Northern Hemisphere mountain stations are hampered by elevation effects. After accounting for these effects, the validation provides satisfactory results. <br><br> At Southern Hemisphere mid- to high latitudes SCIAMACHY is systematically lower than the ground-based measurements for 2003 and 2004, but for 2005 and later years the differences between SCIAMACHY and ground-based measurements fall within the SCIAMACHY precision. The 2003–2004 bias is consistent with previously reported results although its origin remains under investigation. <br><br> No other systematic spatial or temporal biases could be identified based on the validation presented in this paper. <br><br> Validation results are robust with regard to the choices of the instrument-noise error filter, sampling area, and time averaging required for the validation of SCIAMACHY CO total column measurements. <br><br> Finally, our results show that the spatial coverage of the ground-based measurements available for the validation of the 2003–2007 SCIAMACHY CO columns is sub-optimal for validation purposes, and that the recent and ongoing expansion of the ground-based network by carefully selecting new locations may be very beneficial for SCIAMACHY CO and other satellite trace gas measurements validation efforts.