Find in Library
Search millions of books, articles, and more
Indexed Open Access Databases
Estimating the Near-Ground PM<sub>2.5</sub> Concentration over China Based on the CapsNet Model during 2018–2020
oleh: Qiaolin Zeng, Tianshou Xie, Songyan Zhu, Meng Fan, Liangfu Chen, Yu Tian
Format: | Article |
---|---|
Diterbitkan: | MDPI AG 2022-01-01 |
Deskripsi
Fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) threatens human health and the natural environment. Estimating the near-ground PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations accurately is of great significance in air quality research. Statistical and deep-learning models are widely used for estimating PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration based on remotely sensed aerosol optical depth (AOD) products. Deep-learning models can effectively express the nonlinear relationship between AOD, parameters, and PM<sub>2.5</sub>. This study proposed a capsule network model (CapsNet) to address the spatial differences in PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration distribution by introducing a capsule structure and dynamic routing algorithm for the first time, which integrates AOD, surface PM<sub>2.5</sub> measurements, and auxiliary variables (e.g., normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and meteorological parameters). Moreover, we examined the longitude and latitude of pixels as input parameters to reflect spatial location information, and the results showed that the introduction of longitude (LON) and latitude (LAT) parameters improved the model fitting accuracy. The coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) increased by 0.05 ± 0.01, and the root mean square error (RMSE), mean relative error (MRE), and mean absolute error (MAE) decreased by 3.30 ± 1.0 μg/m<sup>3</sup>, 8 ± 3%, and 1.40 ± 0.2 μg/m<sup>3</sup>, respectively. To verify the accuracy of our proposed CapsNet, the deep neural network (DNN) model was executed. The results indicated that the R<sup>2</sup> values of the validation dataset using CapsNet improved by 4 ± 2%, and RMSE, MRE, and MAE decreased by 1.50 ± 0.4 μg/m<sup>3</sup>, ~5%, and 0.60 ± 0.2 μg/m<sup>3</sup>, respectively. Finally, the effects of seasons and spatial region on the fitting accuracy were examined separately from 2018 to 2020. With respect to seasons, the model performed more robustly in the cold season. In terms of spatial region, the R<sup>2</sup> values exceeded 0.9 in the central-eastern region, while the accuracy was lower in the western and coastal regions. This study proposed the CapsNet model to estimate PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations for the first time and achieved good accuracy, which could be used for the estimation of other air contaminants.