Evaluation of Patient Reported Satisfaction and Clinical Efficacy of Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL Versus 100 U/mL in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Using Flash Glucose Monitoring System

oleh: Ayman Abdullah Al Hayek, Asirvatham Alwin Robert, Abdulghani H Al Saeed, Mohamed Abdulaziz Al Dawish

Format: Article
Diterbitkan: SAGE Publishing 2022-05-01

Deskripsi

Background and Aims: To analyze patient-reported satisfaction and clinical effectiveness of concentrated insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) among patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) using a flash glucose monitoring (FGM) system. Methods: This comparative study was conducted among 86 patients with T1D (aged 14-40 years), who were treated with Glargine 100 U/mL (Gla-100) and switched to Gla-300 at day 1 (baseline). The following data were collected from each patient: demographic information, clinical parameters, and glycemic control markers. All patients completed the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (Arabic version), first at baseline and then after 12 weeks. A comparison was done for all the data recorded at baseline (on Gla-100) and after 12 weeks (on Gla-300) and subjected to analysis. Results: Compared to patients treated with Gla-100, significant improvements were observed in the Gla-300 group, in terms of the ambulatory glucose profile (AGP) markers, such as percentage of time spent within the target range of the glucose levels (70-180 mg/dL) ( P  = .037), percentage which fell below the target (<70 mg/dL) ( P  = .027), and percentage of time spent (<54 mg/dL) ( P  = .043). Compared to Gla-100, patients treated with Gla-300 experienced significant improvements in the current treatment satisfactions ( P  = .047), convenient finding treatment recently ( P  = .034), and flexible finding treatment recently ( P  = .041), recommend the current treatment ( P  = .042) and satisfied to continue the current treatment ( P  = .035). Conclusion: Compared to the patients on Gla-100, patients treated with Gla-300 exhibited significant improvements in the AGP markers and degree of treatment satisfaction.