Find in Library
Search millions of books, articles, and more
Indexed Open Access Databases
Prognostic Value of Right Ventricular 3D Speckle-Tracking Strain and Ejection Fraction in Patients With HFpEF
oleh: Yuanli Meng, Yuanli Meng, Yuanli Meng, Yuanli Meng, Shuangshuang Zhu, Shuangshuang Zhu, Shuangshuang Zhu, Yuji Xie, Yuji Xie, Yuji Xie, Yanting Zhang, Yanting Zhang, Yanting Zhang, Mingzhu Qian, Mingzhu Qian, Mingzhu Qian, Lang Gao, Lang Gao, Lang Gao, Meng Li, Meng Li, Meng Li, Yixia Lin, Yixia Lin, Yixia Lin, Wenqian Wu, Wenqian Wu, Wenqian Wu, Jing Wang, Jing Wang, Jing Wang, Yali Yang, Yali Yang, Yali Yang, Qing Lv, Qing Lv, Qing Lv, Li Zhang, Li Zhang, Li Zhang, Li Zhang, Yuman Li, Yuman Li, Yuman Li, Mingxing Xie, Mingxing Xie, Mingxing Xie, Mingxing Xie, Mingxing Xie
| Format: | Article |
|---|---|
| Diterbitkan: | Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-06-01 |
Deskripsi
Background: Right ventricular longitudinal strain of free wall (RV FWLS) assessed by two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography (2D-STE) is recognized as an independent predictor of poor prognosis in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, the prognostic implications of three-dimensional STE (3D-STE) parameters in patients with HFpEF have not been well-established. The purpose of our study was to determine whether 3D-STE parameters were the more powerful predictors of poor outcomes in HFpEF patients compared with 2D-STE indices.Methods: Eighty-one consecutive patients with HFpEF were studied by 2D-STE and 3D-STE. RV volumes, ejection fraction (EF) and 3D-RVFWLS were measured by 3D-STE. 2D-RVFWLS was determined by 2D-STE. Patients were followed for the primary end point of heart failure (HF)-related hospitalization and death for HF.Results: After a median follow-up period of 17 months, 39 (48%) patients reached the end point of cardiovascular events. Compared with HFpEF patients without end-point events, those with end-point events had lower RVEF and 3D-RVFWLS (P < 0.05). Separate multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed that 3D-RVFWLS (HR 5.73; 95% CI 2.77–11.85; P < 0.001), RVEF (HR 3.47; 95% CI 1.47–8.21; P = 0.005), and 2D-RVFWLS (HR 3.17; 95% CI 1.54–6.53; P = 0.002) were independent predictors of adverse outcomes. The models with 3D-RVFWLS (AIC = 246, C-index = 0.75) and RVEF (AIC = 247, C-index = 0.76) had similar predictive performance for future clinical events as with 2D-RVFWLS (AIC = 248, C-index = 0.74).Conclusions: 3D-STE parameters are powerful predictors of poor outcomes, providing a similar predictive value as 2D-STE indices in patients with HFpEF. These findings support the potential of RV 3D-STE to identify HFpEF patients at higher risk for adverse cardiac events.