Find in Library
Search millions of books, articles, and more
Indexed Open Access Databases
Catheter Management and Risk Stratification of Patients With in Inpatient Treatment Due to Acute Epididymitis
oleh: Mike Wenzel, Mike Wenzel, Mike Wenzel, Marina Deuker, Marina Deuker, Maria N. Welte, Benedikt Hoeh, Felix Preisser, Till Homrich, Volkhard A. J. Kempf, Volkhard A. J. Kempf, Volkhard A. J. Kempf, Michael Hogardt, Michael Hogardt, Michael Hogardt, Philipp Mandel, Pierre I. Karakiewicz, Felix K. H. Chun, Luis A. Kluth, Luis A. Kluth
| Format: | Article |
|---|---|
| Diterbitkan: | Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-12-01 |
Deskripsi
Objective: This study aims to evaluate catheter management in acute epididymitis (AE) patients requiring inpatient treatment and risk factors predicting severity of disease.Material and Methods: Patients with diagnosed AE and inpatient treatment between 2004 and 2019 at the University Hospital Frankfurt were analyzed. A risk score, rating severity of AE, including residual urine > 100 ml, fever > 38.0°C, C-reactive protein (CRP) > 5 mg/dl, and white blood count (WBC) > 10/nl was introduced.Results: Of 334 patients, 107 (32%) received a catheter (transurethral (TC): n = 53, 16%, suprapubic (SPC): n = 54, 16%). Catheter patients were older, exhibited more comorbidities, and had higher CRP and WBC compared with the non-catheter group (NC). Median length of stay (LOS) was longer in the catheter group (7 vs. 6 days, p < 0.001), whereas necessity of abscess surgery and recurrent epididymitis did not differ. No differences in those parameters were recorded between TC and SPC. According to our established risk score, 147 (44%) patients exhibited 0–1 (low-risk) and 187 (56%) 2–4 risk factors (high-risk). In the high-risk group, patients received a catheter significantly more often than with low-risk (TC: 22 vs. 9%; SPC: 19 vs. 12%, both p ≤ 0.01). Catheter or high-risk patients exhibited positive urine cultures more frequently than NC or low-risk patients. LOS was comparable between high-risk patients with catheter and low-risk NC patients.Conclusion: Patients with AE who received a catheter at admission were older, multimorbid, and exhibited more severe symptoms of disease compared with the NC patients. A protective effect of catheters might be attributable to patients with adverse risk constellations or high burden of comorbidities. The introduced risk score indicates a possibility for risk stratification.