Find in Library
Search millions of books, articles, and more
Indexed Open Access Databases
Evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of a co-design approach to developing an integrated model of care for people with multi-morbid COPD in rural Nepal: a qualitative study
oleh: Mark Harris, Jane Lloyd, Uday Narayan Yadav, Kedar Prasad Baral, Narendra Bhatta, Suresh Mehata
Format: | Article |
---|---|
Diterbitkan: | BMJ Publishing Group 2021-01-01 |
Deskripsi
Objective To understand the feasibility and acceptability of a co-design approach to developing an integrated model of healthcare for people with multi-morbid chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in rural Nepal.Settings A rural setting of Nepal.Participants Data collection included five video recordings, five key informant interviews and observation notes from a final co-design workshop that involved a total of 68 stakeholders: persons with COPD and their family members; healthcare providers, including respiratory physicians; local community leaders; representatives from local, provincial and federal government; academics; and representatives from non-government organisations.Primary and secondary outcome measure(s) Feasibility and acceptability of using a co-design approach to develop an integrated model of care for people with multi-morbid COPD in rural Nepal.Results Our qualitative evaluation of the Hasso Plattner’s co-design process found that all stakeholders (including people with COPD/community members, primary care practitioners and local government/senior health officials) were actively engaged in and significantly contributed to the process of co-design. Four main themes were identified which determined the feasibility and acceptability of the resulting integrated model of care: engagement of stakeholders, factors contributing to the co-design, consequences of the co-design process, and challenges and opportunities learnt by the researchers and participants in the co-design process. Based on the relationship between the four main themes emerging from this research, we developed an evaluation framework to guide the co-design of a health service innovation.Conclusion Our study demonstrated the feasibility and acceptability of the Hasso Plattner’s co-design process. Our findings suggest that this co-design approach can be useful and acceptableto local communities and government agencies. It enabled the meaningful contribution of adiverse group of stakeholders in the design and delivery of health services in low-income and middle-income countries.