The use of the 1.27&thinsp;µm O<sub>2</sub> absorption band for greenhouse gas monitoring from space and application to MicroCarb

oleh: J.-L. Bertaux, J.-L. Bertaux, A. Hauchecorne, F. Lefèvre, F.-M. Bréon, L. Blanot, D. Jouglet, P. Lafrique, P. Akaev

Format: Article
Diterbitkan: Copernicus Publications 2020-06-01

Deskripsi

<p>Monitoring <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> from space is essential to characterize the spatiotemporal distribution of this major greenhouse gas and quantify its sources and sinks. The mixing ratio of <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> to dry air can be derived from the <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub>∕O<sub>2</sub></span> column ratio. The <span class="inline-formula">O<sub>2</sub></span> column is usually derived from its absorption signature on the solar reflected spectra over the <span class="inline-formula">O<sub>2</sub></span> A band (e.g. Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2), Thermal And Near infrared Sensor for carbon Observation (TANSO)/Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT), TanSat). As a result of atmospheric scattering, the atmospheric path length varies with the aerosols' load, their vertical distribution, and their optical properties. The spectral distance between the <span class="inline-formula">O<sub>2</sub></span> A band (0.76&thinsp;<span class="inline-formula">µ</span>m) and the <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> absorption band (1.6&thinsp;<span class="inline-formula">µ</span>m) results in significant uncertainties due to the varying spectral properties of the aerosols over the globe.</p> <p>There is another <span class="inline-formula">O<sub>2</sub></span> absorption band at 1.27&thinsp;<span class="inline-formula">µ</span>m with weaker lines than in the A band. As the wavelength is much closer to the <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> and <span class="inline-formula">CH<sub>4</sub></span> bands, there is less uncertainty when using it as a proxy of the atmospheric path length to the <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> and <span class="inline-formula">CH<sub>4</sub></span> bands. This <span class="inline-formula">O<sub>2</sub></span> band is used by the Total Carbon Column Observing Network (TCCON) implemented for the validation of space-based greenhouse gas (GHG) observations. However, this absorption band is contaminated by the spontaneous emission of the excited molecule <span class="inline-formula">O<sub>2</sub></span><span class="inline-formula"><sup>*</sup></span>, which is produced by the photo-dissociation of <span class="inline-formula">O<sub>3</sub></span> molecules in the stratosphere and mesosphere. From a satellite looking nadir, this emission has a similar shape to the absorption signal that is used.</p> <p>In the frame of the CNES (Centre National d'Études Spatiales – the French National Centre for Space Studies) MicroCarb project, scientific studies have been performed in 2016–2018 to explore the problems associated with this <span class="inline-formula">O<sub>2</sub></span><span class="inline-formula"><sup>*</sup></span> airglow contamination and methods to correct it. A theoretical synthetic spectrum of the emission was derived from an approach based on <span class="inline-formula"><i>A</i><sub>21</sub></span> Einstein coefficient information contained in the line-by-line high-resolution transmission molecular absorption (HITRAN) 2016 database. The shape of our synthetic spectrum is validated when compared to <span class="inline-formula">O<sub>2</sub></span><span class="inline-formula"><sup>*</sup></span> airglow spectra observed by the Scanning Imaging Absorption Spectrometer for Atmospheric Chartography (SCIAMACHY)/Envisat in limb viewing.</p> <p><span id="page3330"/>We have designed an inversion scheme of SCIAMACHY limb-viewing spectra, allowing to determine the vertical distribution of the volume emission rate (VER) of the <span class="inline-formula">O<sub>2</sub></span><span class="inline-formula"><sup>*</sup></span> airglow. The VER profiles and corresponding integrated nadir intensities were both compared to a model of the emission based on the Reactive Processes Ruling the Ozone Budget in the Stratosphere (REPROBUS) chemical transport model. The airglow intensities depend mostly on the solar zenith angle (both in model and data), and the model underestimates the observed emission by <span class="inline-formula">∼15</span>&thinsp;%. This is confirmed with SCIAMACHY nadir-viewing measurements over the oceans: in such conditions, we have disentangled and retrieved the nadir <span class="inline-formula">O<sub>2</sub></span><span class="inline-formula"><sup>*</sup></span> emission in spite of the moderate spectral resolving power (<span class="inline-formula">∼860</span>) and found that the nadir SCIAMACHY intensities are mostly dictated by solar zenith angle (SZA) and are larger than the model intensities by a factor of <span class="inline-formula">∼1.13</span>. At a fixed SZA, the model airglow intensities show very little horizontal structure, in spite of ozone variations.</p> <p>It is shown that with the MicroCarb spectral resolution power (25&thinsp;000) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), the contribution of the <span class="inline-formula">O<sub>2</sub></span><span class="inline-formula"><sup>*</sup></span> emission at 1.27&thinsp;<span class="inline-formula">µ</span>m to the observed spectral radiance in nadir viewing may be disentangled from the lower atmosphere/ground absorption signature with a great accuracy. Indeed, simulations with 4ARCTIC radiative transfer inversion tool have shown that the <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> mixing ratio may be retrieved with the accuracy required for quantifying the <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> natural sources and sinks (pressure-level error <span class="inline-formula">≤1</span>&thinsp;hPa; <span class="inline-formula"><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M42" display="inline" overflow="scroll" dspmath="mathml"><mrow><msub><mi>X</mi><mrow class="chem"><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mi><mn mathvariant="normal">2</mn></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math><span><svg:svg xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="25pt" height="14pt" class="svg-formula" dspmath="mathimg" md5hash="4daba8d598af8c31e5805916ed7219c1"><svg:image xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="amt-13-3329-2020-ie00001.svg" width="25pt" height="14pt" src="amt-13-3329-2020-ie00001.png"/></svg:svg></span></span> accuracy better than 0.4&thinsp;ppmv) with the <span class="inline-formula">O<sub>2</sub></span> 1.27&thinsp;<span class="inline-formula">µ</span>m band only as the air proxy (without the A band). As a result of these studies (at an intermediate phase), it was decided to include this band (B4) in the MicroCarb design, while keeping the <span class="inline-formula">O<sub>2</sub></span> A band for reference (B1). Our approach is consistent with the approach of Sun et al. (2018), who also analysed the potential of the <span class="inline-formula">O<sub>2</sub></span> 1.27&thinsp;<span class="inline-formula">µ</span>m band and concluded favourably for GHG monitoring from space. We advocate for the inclusion of this <span class="inline-formula">O<sub>2</sub></span> band on other GHG monitoring future space missions, such as GOSAT-3 and EU/European Space Agency (ESA) <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span>-M missions, for a better GHG retrieval.</p>