Interactive Effects of Water and Fertilizer on Yield, Soil Water and Nitrate Dynamics of Young Apple Tree in Semiarid Region of Northwest China

oleh: Hanmi Zhou, Xiaoli Niu, Hui Yan, Na Zhao, Fucang Zhang, Lifeng Wu, Dongxue Yin, Roger Kjelgren

Format: Article
Diterbitkan: MDPI AG 2019-07-01

Deskripsi

Exploring the interactive effect of water and fertilizer on yield, soil water and nitrate dynamics of young apple tree is of great importance to improve the management of irrigation and fertilization in the apple-growing region of semiarid northwest China. A two-year pot experiment was conducted in a mobile rainproof shelter of the water-saving irrigation experimental station in Northwest A&amp;F University, and the investigation evaluated the response of soil water and fertilizer migration, crop water productivity (CWP), irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE), partial factor productivity (PFP) of young apple tree to different water and fertilizer regimes (four levels of soil water: 75%&#8722;85%, 65%&#8722;75%, 55%&#8722;65% and 45%&#8722;55% of field capacity, designated W<sub>1</sub>, W<sub>2</sub>, W<sub>3</sub> and W<sub>4</sub>, respectively; three levels of N-P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>-K<sub>2</sub>O fertilizer, 30-30-10, 20-20-10 and 10-10-10 g plant<sup>&#8722;1</sup>, designated F<sub>1</sub>, F<sub>2</sub> and F<sub>3</sub>, respectively). Results showed that F<sub>1</sub>W<sub>1</sub>, F<sub>2</sub>W<sub>1</sub> and F<sub>3</sub>W<sub>1</sub> had the highest average soil water content at 0~90 cm compared with the other treatments. When fertilizer level was fixed, the average soil water content was gradually increased with increasing irrigation amount. For W<sub>1</sub>, W<sub>2</sub>, W<sub>3</sub> and W<sub>4</sub>, high levels of water content were mainly distributed at 50~80 cm, 40~70 cm, 30~50 cm and 10~30 cm, respectively. There was no significant difference in soil water content at all fertilizer treatments. However, F<sub>1</sub> and F<sub>2</sub> significantly increased soil nitrate-N content by 146.3%~246.4% and 75.3%~151.5% compared with F<sub>3</sub>. The highest yield appeared at F<sub>1</sub>W<sub>1</sub> treatment, but there was little difference between F<sub>1</sub>W<sub>1</sub> and F<sub>2</sub>W<sub>2</sub> treatment. F<sub>2</sub>W<sub>2</sub> treatment decreased yield by 7.5%, but increased IWUE by 11.2% compared with F<sub>1</sub>W<sub>1</sub> treatment. Meanwhile, the highest CWP appeared at F<sub>2</sub>W<sub>2</sub> treatment in the two years. Thus, F<sub>2</sub>W<sub>2</sub> treatment (soil moisture was controlled in 65&#8722;75% of field capacity, N-P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>-K<sub>2</sub>O were controlled at 20-20-10 g&#183;tree<sup>&#8722;1</sup>) reached the best water and fertilizer coupling mode and it was the optimum combinations of water and fertilizer saving.