Combined therapy with conventional trans-arterial chemoembolization (cTACE) and microwave ablation (MWA) for hepatocellular carcinoma >3–<5 cm

oleh: Mohamed M. A. Zaitoun, Saeed B. Elsayed, Nahla A. Zaitoun, Radwa K. Soliman, Ali H. Elmokadem, Alaa A. Farag, Mahmoud Amer, Ali M. Hendi, Nader E. M. Mahmoud, Dalia Salah El Deen, Ahmed M. Alsowey, Shahenda Shahin, Mohammad Abd Alkhalik Basha

Format: Article
Diterbitkan: Taylor & Francis Group 2021-01-01

Deskripsi

Purpose To compare safety and efficacy of combined therapy with conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE)+microwave ablation (MWA) versus only TACE or MWA for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) >3–<5 cm. Methods This randomized controlled trial (NCT04721470) screened 278 patients with HCC >3–<5 cm. Patients were randomized into three groups: 90 underwent TACE (Group 1); 95 underwent MWA (Group 2); and 93 underwent combined therapy (Group 3). Patients were followed-up with contrast-enhanced CT or MRI. Images were evaluated and compared for treatment response and adverse events based on modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumor. Serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) concentration was measured at baseline and during every follow-up visit. Results Final analysis included 265 patients (154 men, 111 women; mean age = 54.5 ± 11.8 years; range = 38–76 years). Complete response was achieved by 86.5% of patients who received combined therapy compared with 54.8% with only TACE and 56.5% with only MWA (p = 0.0002). The recurrence rate after 12 months was significantly lower in Group 3 (22.47%) than Groups 1 (60.7%) and 2 (51.1%) (p = 0.0001). The overall survival rate (three years after therapy) was significantly higher in Group 3 (69.6%) than Groups 1 (54.7%) and 2 (54.3%) (p = 0.02). The mean progression-free survival was significantly higher in Group 3 than groups 1 and 2 (p < 0.001). A decrease in AFP concentration was seen in 75%, 63%, and 48% patients of Group 3, 2, and 1, respectively. Conclusions Combined therapy with cTACE + MWA is safe, well-tolerated, and more effective than TACE or MWA alone for treatment of HCC >3–<5 cm.