Distinct effects of rectum delineation methods in 3D-confromal vs. IMRT treatment planning of prostate cancer

oleh: Vordermark Dirk, Baier Kurt, Meyer Jürgen, Guckenberger Matthias, Flentje Michael

Format: Article
Diterbitkan: BMC 2006-09-01

Deskripsi

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The dose distribution to the rectum, delineated as solid organ, rectal wall and rectal surface, in 3D conformal (3D-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatment (IMRT) planning for localized prostate cancer was evaluated.</p> <p>Materials and methods</p> <p>In a retrospective planning study 3-field, 4-field and IMRT treatment plans were analyzed for ten patients with localized prostate cancer. The dose to the rectum was evaluated based on dose-volume histograms of <b><it>1) </it></b>the entire rectal volume (DVH) <b><it>2) </it></b>manually delineated rectal wall (DWH) <b><it>3) </it></b>rectal wall with 3 mm wall thickness (DWH<sub>3</sub>) <b><it>4) </it></b>and the rectal surface (DSH). The influence of the rectal filling and of the seminal vesicles' anatomy on these dose parameters was investigated. A literature review of the dose-volume relationship for late rectal toxicity was conducted.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>In 3D-CRT (3-field and 4-field) the dose parameters differed most in the mid-dose region: the DWH showed significantly lower doses to the rectum (8.7% ± 4.2%) compared to the DWH<sub>3 </sub>and the DSH. In IMRT the differences between dose parameters were larger in comparison with 3D-CRT. Differences were statistically significant between DVH and all other dose parameters and between DWH and DSH. Mean doses were increased by 23.6% ± 8.7% in the DSH compared to the DVH in the mid-dose region. Furthermore, both the rectal filling and the anatomy of the seminal vesicles influenced the relationship between the dose parameters: a significant correlation of the difference between DVH and DWH and the rectal volume was seen in IMRT treatment.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>The method of delineating the rectum significantly influenced the dose representation in the dose-volume histogram. This effect was pronounced in IMRT treatment planning compared to 3D-CRT. For integration of dose-volume parameters from the literature into clinical practice these results have to be considered.</p>