Find in Library

Purpose. To investigate the efficacy and safety of orthokeratology (ortho-k) and repeated low-level red-light (RLRL) therapy in treating poor responders of ortho-k in myopic children. Methods. Study participants were 100 myopic children who completed two years of ortho-k treatment in a retrospective study. In the first year of ortho-k treatment (phase one), they experienced axial elongation of 0.30 mm or greater (defined as poor responders to ortho-k). Children were divided into two groups: the orthokeratology group (OK, n = 45) continued to receive ortho-k monotherapy and the combination group (OK-RLRL, n = 55) received RLRL in addition to ortho-k for the next year (phase two). Axial elongation over time between the groups was compared. Results. The mean age, male-to-female ratio, axial length (AL), and axial elongation in phase one were comparable between OK and OK-RLRL groups (all P>0.05). During phase two, significant AL shortening was observed in the OK-RLRL group compared with children in the OK group (−0.10 ± 0.16 mm vs 0.30 ± 0.19 mm, P<0.001). Among these 55 myopic children in the OK-RLRL group, 35 (63.6%), 25 (45.4%), 11 (20%), 6 (10.9%), and 3 (5.4%) of them had AL shortening over 0.05 mm/year, 0.10 mm/year, and 0.20 mm/year, 0.3 mm/year, and 0.4 mm/year, respectively. Older baseline age (β = −0.02), higher treatment compliance (β = −0.462), and AL change at 1 month (β = 1.263) were significantly associated with less AL elongation (all P<0.05). Conclusions. For poor responders of orthokeratology, RLRL could slow axial elongation in addition to the ortho-k treatment effect. Those who respond poorly to ortho-k with elder age might benefit more from combined therapy.