Find in Library
Search millions of books, articles, and more
Indexed Open Access Databases
Hysteretic temperature sensitivity of wetland CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes explained by substrate availability and microbial activity
oleh: K.-Y. Chang, W. J. Riley, P. M. Crill, R. F. Grant, S. R. Saleska
Format: | Article |
---|---|
Diterbitkan: | Copernicus Publications 2020-11-01 |
Deskripsi
<p>Methane (CH<span class="inline-formula"><sub>4</sub></span>) emissions from wetlands are likely increasing and important in global climate change assessments. However, contemporary terrestrial biogeochemical model predictions of CH<span class="inline-formula"><sub>4</sub></span> emissions are very uncertain, at least in part due to prescribed temperature sensitivity of CH<span class="inline-formula"><sub>4</sub></span> production and emission. While statistically consistent apparent CH<span class="inline-formula"><sub>4</sub></span> emission temperature dependencies have been inferred from meta-analyses across microbial to ecosystem scales, year-round ecosystem-scale observations have contradicted that finding. Here, we show that apparent CH<span class="inline-formula"><sub>4</sub></span> emission temperature dependencies inferred from year-round chamber measurements exhibit substantial intra-seasonal variability, suggesting that using static temperature relations to predict CH<span class="inline-formula"><sub>4</sub></span> emissions is mechanistically flawed. Our model results indicate that such intra-seasonal variability is driven by substrate-mediated microbial and abiotic interactions: seasonal cycles in substrate availability favors CH<span class="inline-formula"><sub>4</sub></span> production later in the season, leading to hysteretic temperature sensitivity of CH<span class="inline-formula"><sub>4</sub></span> production and emission. Our findings demonstrate the uncertainty of inferring CH<span class="inline-formula"><sub>4</sub></span> emission or production rates from temperature alone and highlight the need to represent microbial and abiotic interactions in wetland biogeochemical models.</p>