Find in Library
Search millions of books, articles, and more
Indexed Open Access Databases
Distinguishing different types of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children using artificial neural network with clinical intelligent test
oleh: I-Cheng Lin, I-Cheng Lin, Shen-Chieh Chang, Yu-Jui Huang, Terry B. J. Kuo, Hung-Wen Chiu, Hung-Wen Chiu, Hung-Wen Chiu
Format: | Article |
---|---|
Diterbitkan: | Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-01 |
Deskripsi
BackgroundAttention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a well-studied topic in child and adolescent psychiatry. ADHD diagnosis relies on information from an assessment scale used by teachers and parents and psychological assessment by physicians; however, the assessment results can be inconsistent.PurposeTo construct models that automatically distinguish between children with predominantly inattentive-type ADHD (ADHD-I), with combined-type ADHD (ADHD-C), and without ADHD.MethodsClinical records with age 6–17 years-old, for January 2011–September 2020 were collected from local general hospitals in northern Taiwan; the data were based on the SNAP-IV scale, the second and third editions of Conners’ Continuous Performance Test (CPT), and various intelligence tests. This study used an artificial neural network to construct the models. In addition, k-fold cross-validation was applied to ensure the consistency of the machine learning results.ResultsWe collected 328 records using CPT-3 and 239 records using CPT-2. With regard to distinguishing between ADHD-I and ADHD-C, a combination of demographic information, SNAP-IV scale results, and CPT-2 results yielded overall accuracies of 88.75 and 85.56% in the training and testing sets, respectively. The replacement of CPT-2 with CPT-3 results in this model yielded an overall accuracy of 90.46% in the training set and 89.44% in the testing set. With regard to distinguishing between ADHD-I, ADHD-C, and the absence of ADHD, a combination of demographic information, SNAP-IV scale results, and CPT-2 results yielded overall accuracies of 86.74 and 77.43% in the training and testing sets, respectively.ConclusionThis proposed model distinguished between the ADHD-I and ADHD-C groups with 85–90% accuracy, and it distinguished between the ADHD-I, ADHD-C, and control groups with 77–86% accuracy. The machine learning model helps clinicians identify patients with ADHD in a timely manner.