Find in Library
Search millions of books, articles, and more
Indexed Open Access Databases
The nitrogen, carbon and greenhouse gas budget of a grazed, cut and fertilised temperate grassland
oleh: S. K. Jones, C. Helfter, M. Anderson, M. Coyle, C. Campbell, D. Famulari, C. Di Marco, N. van Dijk, Y. S. Tang, C. F. E. Topp, R. Kiese, R. Kindler, J. Siemens, M. Schrumpf, K. Kaiser, E. Nemitz, P. E. Levy, R. M. Rees, M. A. Sutton, U. M. Skiba
| Format: | Article |
|---|---|
| Diterbitkan: | Copernicus Publications 2017-04-01 |
Deskripsi
Intensively managed grazed grasslands in temperate climates are globally important environments for the exchange of the greenhouse gases (GHGs) carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>), nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) and methane (CH<sub>4</sub>). We assessed the N and C budget of a mostly grazed and occasionally cut and fertilised grassland in SE Scotland by measuring or modelling all relevant imports and exports to the field as well as changes in soil C and N stocks over time. The N budget was dominated by import from inorganic and organic fertilisers (21.9 g N m<sup>−2</sup> a<sup>−1</sup>) and losses from leaching (5.3 g N m<sup>−2</sup> a<sup>−1</sup>), N<sub>2</sub> emissions (2.9 g N m<sup>−2</sup> a<sup>−1</sup>), and NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> and NH<sub>3</sub> volatilisation (3.9 g N m<sup>−2</sup> a<sup>−1</sup>), while N<sub>2</sub>O emission was only 0.6 g N m<sup>−2</sup> a<sup>−1</sup>. The efficiency of N use by animal products (meat and wool) averaged 9.9 % of total N input over only-grazed years (2004–2010). On average over 9 years (2002–2010), the balance of N fluxes suggested that 6.0 ± 5.9 g N m<sup>−2</sup> a<sup>−1</sup> (mean ± confidence interval at <i>p</i> > 0.95) were stored in the soil. The largest component of the C budget was the net ecosystem exchange of CO<sub>2</sub> (NEE), at an average uptake rate of 218 ± 155 g C m<sup>−2</sup> a<sup>−1</sup> over the 9 years. This sink strength was offset by carbon export from the field mainly as grass offtake for silage (48.9 g C m<sup>−2</sup> a<sup>−1</sup>) and leaching (16.4 g C m<sup>−2</sup> a<sup>−1</sup>). The other export terms, CH<sub>4</sub> emissions from the soil, manure applications and enteric fermentation, were negligible and only contributed to 0.02–4.2 % of the total C losses. Only a small fraction of C was incorporated into the body of the grazing animals. Inclusion of these C losses in the budget resulted in a C sink strength of 163 ± 140 g C m<sup>−2</sup> a<sup>−1</sup>. By contrast, soil stock measurements taken in May 2004 and May 2011 indicated that the grassland sequestered N in the 0–60 cm soil layer at 4.51 ± 2.64 g N m<sup>−2</sup> a<sup>−1</sup> and lost C at a rate of 29.08 ± 38.19 g C m<sup>−2</sup> a<sup>−1</sup>. Potential reasons for the discrepancy between these estimates are probably an underestimation of C losses, especially from leaching fluxes as well as from animal respiration. The average greenhouse gas (GHG) balance of the grassland was −366 ± 601 g CO<sub>2</sub> eq. m<sup>−2</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> and was strongly affected by CH<sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions. The GHG sink strength of the NEE was reduced by 54 % by CH<sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions. Estimated enteric fermentation from ruminating sheep proved to be an important CH<sub>4</sub> source, exceeding the contribution of N<sub>2</sub>O to the GHG budget in some years.