Critical Psychiatry Debates; A Neglected Tool in Undergraduate Medical Education

oleh: Ahmad Allam, Ashvin Kuri, Ali Ajaz, Saman Ahmed, Peter Carter, Ania Korszun

Format: Article
Diterbitkan: F1000 Research Ltd 2021-09-01

Deskripsi

Background: Healthcare professionals must adapt to everyday clinical controversies using their critical thinking and communication skills. Educational debates nurture these skills producing a well-rounded clinician. Their value is well established in healthcare education, yet they are not commonly employed, and there is no literature on their use in undergraduate Psychiatry teaching.   Methods: We planned and implemented a one-off educational debate lesson as part of the teaching program of fourth-year medical students on their Psychiatry clinical placements. We collected and analyzed the students’ feedback.   Results: Although most students had no experience of debates, 79% found the learning event positive. The students also reported improvement in their confidence (58%), oral presentation skills (37%), critical thinking skills (71%) and the ability to cope with conflict (54%). In addition, there was a positive shift in their attitude towards Psychiatry (71%) and the chances of choosing it as a future speciality (33%).   Conclusion: Our results showcase the benefit of using debates in shaping future doctors’ non-clinical skills and practice attitudes. In this paper, we discuss a thematic analysis of students’ feedback comments and reflect on several points in the planning and delivering educational debates. We also include practical recommendations for future applications.