Find in Library
Search millions of books, articles, and more
Indexed Open Access Databases
Critical Psychiatry Debates; A Neglected Tool in Undergraduate Medical Education
oleh: Ahmad Allam, Ashvin Kuri, Ali Ajaz, Saman Ahmed, Peter Carter, Ania Korszun
| Format: | Article |
|---|---|
| Diterbitkan: | F1000 Research Ltd 2021-09-01 |
Deskripsi
Background: Healthcare professionals must adapt to everyday clinical controversies using their critical thinking and communication skills. Educational debates nurture these skills producing a well-rounded clinician. Their value is well established in healthcare education, yet they are not commonly employed, and there is no literature on their use in undergraduate Psychiatry teaching. Methods: We planned and implemented a one-off educational debate lesson as part of the teaching program of fourth-year medical students on their Psychiatry clinical placements. We collected and analyzed the students’ feedback. Results: Although most students had no experience of debates, 79% found the learning event positive. The students also reported improvement in their confidence (58%), oral presentation skills (37%), critical thinking skills (71%) and the ability to cope with conflict (54%). In addition, there was a positive shift in their attitude towards Psychiatry (71%) and the chances of choosing it as a future speciality (33%). Conclusion: Our results showcase the benefit of using debates in shaping future doctors’ non-clinical skills and practice attitudes. In this paper, we discuss a thematic analysis of students’ feedback comments and reflect on several points in the planning and delivering educational debates. We also include practical recommendations for future applications.